![]() This lets Acumatica offer more features and functions than Dynamics NAV and at a lower price. ![]() See how Acumatica compares to Business Central.Ĭonversely, Acumatica was designed from the start to be accessible through the cloud using modern web technology. However, Business Central still uses the old software at its core, and legacy on-premises NAV users will find that upgrading to Business Central will require rewriting all customizations to meet the new Business Central requirements-an expensive proposition. Microsoft has rearchitected NAV to make it cloud compatible and rebranded the product as Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central. ![]() Microsoft Dynamics NAV’s much older system architecture becomes an issue in scenarios designed for the latest technologies, including cloud deployment options, customizations using current development tools, and integration with CRM. It was a great product then, and, although many improvements have been made over the years, it still uses the same proprietary code, the same data structures, and the same client-server architecture. ![]() Dynamics NAV was originally developed in the 1980s. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |